The maps reveal that upper-level cyclonic systems are most common over the northern part of Baffin Bay; the semi-permanent wintertime cyclonic swirl in this area is often referred to as the polar vortex, although the polar vortex is much more clearly defined and more stable in the stratospheric circulation. There is also a high frequency of cyclonic action in much of the high Arctic and in the zone from the Sea of Okhotsk to the Gulf of Alaska.
The change in frequency from 1951-1980 to 2001-2013 is shown below; it's rather a noisy map, with a lot of small-scale features, but overall it seems there has been a net increase in the population of cut-off lows.
In view of the increase in frequency for both blocking highs and lows, we might expect that the mean westerly flow aloft has become weaker over time as the flow is more often blocked or stagnant. This would be consistent with the hypothesis regarding potential implications of warming in the Arctic: as the pole-to-equator temperature gradient weakens, the jet stream will also weaken. The maps below show the mean westerly wind in the three periods and, lastly, the difference between 1951-1980 and 2001-2013. There has clearly been some weakening near the wind maxima off the northeastern United States and in the western Pacific; but the westerly wind has strengthened in some other locations, notably over central Asia. A little more investigation would be required to measure the net decrease (if any) in westerly momentum.
Update: reader Eric asked about the ratio of cyclonic to anticyclonic blocks. The map below shows the ratio of the frequencies for the entire history; cyclonic cut-off centers are more common in most locations, although eastern Alaska and northwest Canada are an exception. In fact, looking again at the first three maps above, it is evident that northwestern Canada and eastern Alaska have the lowest frequency of cut-off lows of any northern location (north of 60 °N).
"Wintertime cyclonic swirl." I'm going to start calling ice cream cones that. Maybe that could be a flavor for Hot Licks.ReplyDelete
How many blocking lows have a corresponding blocking low? Pushing air around is what the jet stream does and when you block air in one place it can easily pool somewhere else.
While I find the distribution of pressures reliable, I'll still claim that the differences in westerly winds are too small and variable to make any judgements.
Eric, glad you enjoyed the descriptor! I added a new map to show the ratio of the frequencies - good idea to look at this.Delete
That wasn't exactly what I was looking for. I actually was wondering how many highs were paired with a low. You could argue that true blocking lows/highs aren't strongly coupled to a counterpart. Then we could find true blocking systems and not more general climatology. But that's actually very intensive. And I like the difference plot still.Delete
Speaking of the new plot. The Aleutian Low shows up really nicely. Couple that with the high pressure in north Alaska and you can see why the Bering sea is dangerous. And wouldn't the preponderance of lows in NW Canada be a source of nor'easters?