Sunday, August 18, 2019

Rain: Feast or Famine

Another round of heavy rain fell across the central interior late last week, taking the month's rainfall total to over 5 inches in Fairbanks, and exacerbating flood problems in the area.  According to the NWS, the Salcha River to the southeast of Fairbanks is the highest it's been since 2014 (the wettest summer of record in Fairbanks); here's the hydrograph:


A webcam view of the Tanana River at Nenana from yesterday morning (the latest available) shows a rather swollen river, and according to the NWS there is some flooding in the town.


Only a couple of years in the past have seen so much rain in Fairbanks in the entire month of August, with one of course being the flood year of 1967.  With flood control measures now in place, a repeat of that flood will not occur in Fairbanks, and indeed the Moose Creek Dam is operating tonight to regulate the Chena River flow volume.

Readers in south-central Alaska may well wish that some of the rain would make its way south of the Alaska Range, because while Fairbanks is near-record wet, Anchorage has seen no measurable rainfall at all this month so far.  This is an extraordinary contrast: Fairbanks is second-wettest on record for the month to date (only lagging 1967), while Anchorage is record dry.  The chart below shows August 1-17 rainfall totals for the two cities over their common climate history since 1952.


How can we explain the difference in rainfall fortunes over such a relatively short distance?  The map below shows the 500mb height anomaly (departure from normal) for the first 16 days of the month; the glaring feature is the high pressure anomaly just to the southwest of Anchorage, which has deflected the jet stream and associated weather systems farther north into western and central Alaska.


Below is the actual 500mb height map, instead of the departure from normal.  The ridge near southwest Alaska extends far to the south and southwest, and on the west side of the ridge a long fetch of southerly flow can be inferred, stretching from the central western Pacific up to the Bering Sea and then east into the interior.  This is the moist flow that has created the persistent rain in the interior.


Here's what the flow looks like at 700mb, or about 10,000 feet up in the atmosphere.


Let's compare the recent pattern to what typically occurs when Fairbanks is considerably wetter than Anchorage in the first half of August; the map below shows the average 500mb height anomaly in 6 such years.  There are some distinct similarities to the height anomaly map above, but in the historical (and less extreme) events the unusual ridge was farther west along the Aleutians, rather than sitting in close proximity to Anchorage.


In the opposite scenario where Anchorage is notably wetter than Fairbanks at this time of year, it's not too surprising to see that there is a trough (lower heights) near Bristol Bay, rather than a ridge.  This pattern would allow a vigorous jet stream to affect south-central Alaska, but a downslope component to the flow over the Alaska Range would bring much drier weather to the interior.


Sunday, August 11, 2019

Rainy Season

Parts of interior and western Alaska have seen a lot of rain in recent days, which is of course good news as far as wildfires are concerned: there has been minimal growth in fire acreage this month so far.  But the copious rainfall has brought other problems to some locations, including flooding and (at least in Denali NP) mud and rock slides.

Here are maps of daily estimated precipitation since the beginning of the month:











Rain was especially remarkable across the Seward Peninsula and the northwest interior in the first few days of the month, with Nome reporting its highest 24-hour rain total of record (2.47").  Rain amounts from some other sites were even more remarkable; see below for a graphic published by the NWS on the evening of August 3rd.


This time of year does of course tend to be relatively wet in interior and western Alaska, but there's a very pronounced west-east gradient in when the wettest conditions tend to occur.  Consider the contrast in timing of peak rainfall frequency between Nome, Fairbanks, and Northway - see the charts below.  Far up the Tanana River valley in Northway, measurable rainfall is most frequent at the beginning of July, and August actually sees much less rain than July on average, so the rainy season, such as there is, ends quickly there as summer wanes.

In Fairbanks the peak in precipitation frequency is about 4 weeks later than in Northway, according to 1981-2010 normals from NOAA, and August tends to bring considerably more hours of rain, and more cloud, than July.  (However, the total August rainfall is a bit less than in July, because there are fewer heavy rain events.  For more discussion of July versus August, see posts here and here.)

In contrast, if we go all the way over to Nome, August is much wetter than July and clearly stands out as the wettest month of the year.




The map below gives a sense of how the date of peak precipitation frequency varies across the entire state.  It generally advances from early July to early August from east to west across the interior, reaches late August or early September along the west and southwest coast, and then most of the south-central region sees the height of its rainy season in late September (when interior weather is usually much improved).  Of course the epic rainy season of southeastern Alaska doesn't reach its peak until October.


Here's a zoomed-in map to reveal a bit more of the local variation in the southeast interior and south-central.

Finally, the peak climatological value of precipitation frequency is depicted in the map below.  Unlike the seasonal timing, the maximum frequency of precipitation is surprisingly uniform from west to east across central Alaska, with peak values of 40-50% in many locations.  In the Fairbanks area, the only locations with normal precipitation frequency rising above 50% are the Keystone Ridge and Two Rivers co-op sites; and North Pole apparently never exceeds 35%.


Friday, August 2, 2019

Sea Ice Update

An update on Arctic sea ice conditions has been long overdue on this blog, although Rick Thoman has been providing excellent updates all summer via his Twitter feed.  Nevertheless it's worth reiterating the main headlines, which are that Chukchi Sea ice is at record low levels for the time of year, and Arctic-wide sea ice stands a chance of breaking the record low from 2012.

Unsurprisingly, the extraordinary shortfall of ice in the Bering Sea last winter set the stage for extremely early meltout farther north, and Chukchi Sea ice extent has been almost continuously at record lows ever since meltout began in early May.


The figures below show the NWS sea ice analyses from today (top) and last year on this date (below).  It's quite a difference in both the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, although the Beaufort Sea ice deficit is not at record levels.





For the Arctic Ocean as a whole, sea ice is running just about neck-and-neck with 2012, which saw the lowest seasonal minimum on record.  However, a new record low this year isn't necessarily likely, because the rate of meltout was so great in August 2012 that it may be tough to keep pace this year.  Much will depend on the weather pattern in the next several weeks, including the degree of storminess and the amount of warm air that is imported into the Arctic from southerly latitudes.  In 2012 an intense low pressure system in early August probably contributed to the rapid ice loss by breaking up ice and mixing it with warm water.  The forecast for the next week or two looks more suggestive of high pressure in the Arctic, but on the other hand there's no lack of warmth in waters south of the ice edge, so I think a challenge to the 2012 record must be a real possibility.  We'll know soon enough.



Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Northwest Warmth

Blog posts will be scarce in the next week or two as I'm traveling, but here's a quick post to highlight the really extraordinary warmth that northwestern Alaska has seen in recent weeks and months.  In large part owing to the lack of nearby sea ice (in winter) and much above-normal nearby ocean temperatures (in summer), air temperatures have been almost constantly above normal for nearly two years now.  According to data from Kotzebue, the last calendar month that was cooler than the 1981-2010 normal was August 2017.  Click to enlarge the figure below.


But as if the events of 2017-2018 were not enough, the warmth has kicked it up another notch since the middle of last winter, as each of the last 6 months has been at least 10°F warmer than normal.  Remarkably, Kotzebue hasn't seen a single day below normal since March 18, and that was only by a fraction of a degree; the last "significant" cold spell was in the first half of January.  Daily temperatures have been frequently more than 1 standard deviation above the daily normal, and it is becoming unusual to see a day that is not in that upper 15% of the climatological distribution (above +1SD).


Here's one more statistic to illustrate how warm it's been this summer so far: Kotzebue has seen 16 days this year with a daily minimum temperature at or above 60°F.  That's easily a record for any year, and it's more than occurred in total in the 3 decades from 1940 to 1970.  They even managed a daily minimum of 69°F on July 9 this year, which is an all-time record high value and more typical of the tropics than the Arctic.

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Lightning Distribution

As a follow-up to last week's post on extreme lightning activity, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at the spatial distribution of lightning in Alaska, as documented by the Alaska Lightning Detection Network.  As many readers know, the ALDN system underwent a transition in 2012 to a new network with different sensors, so the data are not directly comparable pre- and post-2012.  However, we can look at each period separately and make some qualitative comparisons.

The map below (click to enlarge) shows the density of lightning strikes in the 1986-2012 data, and you can zoom in by viewing the map on the ArcGIS platform at the following link:

http://arcg.is/1zvGHm0



The ArcGIS link also includes a second layer that shows the 2012-2018 data; you should be able to toggle the layers by navigating to "Content" on the left side of the interface.  Here's a static version of the 2012-2018 map:


Note that the data values are essentially arbitrary; they are obtained by counting the number of lightning strikes in latitude-longitude grid boxes, so there is a small north-south discrepancy in terms of the land area within each grid box.  Also, as mentioned above the new ALDN sensors record lightning strikes at a different rate than the old network, so we can't do a comparison of total strikes between the two periods.

However, it does seem that we can make one very interesting observation, which is that recent years have seen much more lightning in the southern interior than in the rest of the interior, and this is very different from the spatial distribution in the earlier decades.  The 1986-2012 history shows the highest concentration of lightning in the Yukon-Tanana uplands, and especially in the hills just to the east and northeast of Fairbanks.  This seems reasonable and agrees with earlier results here:

https://www.firescience.gov/projects/07-2-1-42/project/07-2-1-42_ams_alaska_ltg_climo_2009.pdf

In contrast, the data from the past 7 years shows the highest lightning density along the west and north side of the Alaska Range and in the upper Tanana River valley.  It's a striking difference (pardon the pun).

To confirm the result, I re-calculated the number of strikes within two similar latitude/longitude rectangles: one focused on the 2012-2018 hotspot to the south of McGrath, and the other centered on the hills near Fairbanks.  In the 1986-2012 data, the Fairbanks area saw about twice as much lightning as the McGrath region, but in 2012-2018 the ratio was approximately reversed.

Of course the past 7 years is a short period from which to draw any conclusions, especially when the sum total of lightning activity is so heavily influenced by a relatively small number of very active days.  For example, 20% of all 2012-2018 lightning in my box south of McGrath occurred in a single day: June 23, 2015 (see below).  So the apparent southward shift in lightning density since 2012 might be related to just a few very unusual events, and therefore might not be statistically significant.  But it is quite intriguing nonetheless, and I can't help wondering if the exceptional North Pacific warmth of the past several years might have something to do with it.  Some interesting research could be done here.


Friday, July 12, 2019

Lightning Outbreak

Yesterday was an extraordinary day for lightning in Alaska, with the highest number of lightning strikes recorded for any single day in the 2012-present history of the modern Alaska Lightning Detection Network.  The previous daily record from 2016 was broken by about 25%, based on strike counts for 24 hour periods ending at 6 am.

Note that the ALDN database includes plenty of lightning data from northwestern Canada, but I'm excluding anything east of 141°W (the north-south Alaska/Yukon border) so as to focus on Alaska.  (But yesterday also broke the record for the entire domain, and also for days defined as midnight-to-midnight.)





The annual totals and peak daily numbers for each year since 2012 are shown below.  It will be interesting to see if this year sets a record for the annual total; we are already past the climatological peak in lightning activity for Alaska, but a few more big days could push 2019 into first place.


Monday, July 8, 2019

Heat and Smoke

As I'm sure all readers are fully aware, an extraordinarily intense heat wave has been occurring across much of southern Alaska in the past week, and longstanding temperature records have been falling left and right.   Here's a quick summary that Rick Thoman posted yesterday:


 

There's far too much to comment on, but the remarkable July 4 heat in Anchorage may be the most astonishing statistic: the previous all-time record for the city's official climate site was only 85°F.

Dense smoke from wildfires has held temperatures down in some parts of the interior, including Fairbanks, but many locations in western and southern Alaska are well up into the 80s today.  Particularly striking to me is the 87°F currently being reported from Noatak in the northwest - above the Arctic Circle - and 92°F earlier today at the high-quality CRN station to the southeast of Ruby.


Here's an annotated true-color satellite image, courtesy of Rick Thoman and UAF:



Click on the image below for a higher resolution version:


 As bad as the smoke is at the moment in Fairbanks, this summer has a long way to go to equal the awful summer of 2004 in terms of duration and choking density of smoke - see the chart below, showing data from the Fairbanks airport ASOS instrument.  Here's hoping that 2004 remains an outlier.


Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Wildfire Activity

Increasingly unusual warmth in the past couple of weeks has allowed wildfire activity to pick up substantially across Alaska, and as of today the state has seen about double the normal fire acreage for the date.  The typical midpoint for statewide fire acreage is only about a week away, and so 2019's acreage is close to exceeding the median value for the entire season.  The last 3 years were relatively normal for statewide fire activity (at least based on a "modern" normal since 1995), but with another round of heat currently developing across Alaska, there's little doubt that 2019 will end up with significantly above-normal wildfire activity.  Click to enlarge the figure below.


The fire that is drawing the most attention from fire suppression experts is the Shovel Creek fire, which is very close to Fairbanks - just the other side of Murphy Dome.  The fire is not nearly as large as some other fires in the state, but it is expected to grow and there is a high risk to properties near Fairbanks.  Consequently a national-level command (Type 1 IMT) is taking over the suppression efforts tomorrow; I'm not sure how often this occurs in Alaska.

Here are a couple of maps showing how the Shovel Creek fire grew between Friday (3,424 acres) and yesterday (10,008 acres).  Ester Dome (on the west side of Fairbanks) is located in the lower right of the map domain.  Let's hope the trend does not continue.



Last year I commented on the positive correlation between North Pacific sea surface temperatures and Alaska wildfire activity, so perhaps it should be no surprise that this fire season is becoming active.  The Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska surface temperatures have been far above normal since winter, and Rick Thoman has been documenting (via his Twitter feed) temperature anomalies of several degrees Celsius to the west of Alaska in recent weeks.  From a global perspective, the warmth in the North Pacific is one of the more striking features in the global oceans at present; here's a map of May SST departure from normal in terms of standard deviations.


To reinforce the idea of a link between Alaska fire and North Pacific temperatures, the chart below shows a 25 year history of the North Pacific Mode index in May and subsequent Alaska fire acreage.  Remarkably, all of the very active fire seasons in recent decades have occurred when the NPM index was positive.  Recall that the NPM represents a specific pattern of SST anomalies that extends west-east across the North Pacific to the south of Alaska; not surprisingly, the NPM was positive in May and has become strongly positive in recent weeks (see figures below).




The long-term history of the NPM index does not have a rising trend over time, but this is by design: the NPM definition proposed by Hartmann (2015) removes the linear trend from the SST data before doing the EOF analysis.  In contrast, if we look at area-average SSTs from 40°N to the Bering Strait, there is a very significant warming trend, and the past several years have been persistently very warm.


It stands to reason that higher temperatures would favor increased wildfire activity, all else being equal, because earlier snowmelt allows fuels to dry out earlier in the year, and increased evapotranspiration creates larger moisture deficits if rainfall does not increase.  The long-term increase in temperature has probably therefore produced a background increase in fire activity, or an increase in what is "normal" for a multi-year or decadal period.

However, the year-to-year variability in ocean and atmosphere patterns is still very large and obviously controls the level of fire activity in any given year; and the NPM appears to be closely connected to the key weather factors that influence Alaska fire activity.  A lot more research could be done on this, and it seems likely that useful seasonal fire predictions might be possible.  If anyone is interested in collaboration, leave a comment!

Monday, June 24, 2019

Utqiaġvik Temperature Records

Exceptional warmth occurred last week over much of northern Alaska, and a significant new record high temperature was set at Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), where the 73°F on Thursday was the highest on record for the month of June; the previous record was 72°F in 1996.  June therefore joins May, October, and January as having set or tied calendar-month high temperature records in the last few years.

There are some interesting aspects to the distribution of Utqiaġvik's calendar-month records over the decades, but first I'll state the obvious: average temperatures have increased very dramatically in the 100+ years of climate observations, and daily record high temperatures have been broken or tied with high frequency in recent years.  The second chart below shows a running 10-year total number of high temperature records, both for daily maximum temperature and for high daily minimum temperature.  Very nearly half of all of the calendar-day high temperature records have been set or tied since 1990.  Note that I'm only using the Weather Bureau/NWS era of 1930-present for the analysis of records.




The distribution of daily low temperature records is even more striking, because the frequency has dropped to just about zero in recent years.  In fact, the last time a calendar-day record was broken (not tied) for daily minimum temperature was in February 2009, and if we allow data from the 1920s, we have to go back to 2006 to find a new low temperature record.


In light of this, the much smaller sample of calendar-month records is interesting; see the chart below.  The red columns show the number of calendar-month high temperature records for non-overlapping decades since 1930; these are the monthly records (set or tied) for daily maximum temperature, of which four have been reached in the past few years.  The blue columns show the high records for daily minimum temperature, and a few of these have also been broken or tied in recent years (January, July, and November).


The obviously interesting aspect of this is how many of Utqiaġvik's calendar-month records were set in the 1930s and are still standing; in fact the largest number of warm records (daily max and daily min) from a single decade is from the 1930s.  This is really quite surprising, given the ramp-up in mean temperatures and daily warm records.  Of course the calendar-month records represent a very small and rather arbitrary sample of the most extreme events, and a more rigorous statistical analysis would be needed to make a definitive statement; but this does seem to suggest that the very extreme warm tails of the temperature distribution have not shifted as much as the less extreme parts of the distribution.  In other words, it appears that the modern warmer climate is not producing very-rare warm extremes of the same amplitude (relative to the mean) as the climate of the 1930s.  I've noted before on this blog that the 1930s was a time of wild extremes in Alaska climate, and this is another piece of evidence in that direction.

Here's the distribution of calendar-month cold records in Utqiaġvik.  The 1970s really stand out, and this is fairly consistent with the mean temperature and the daily records from that decade, although the monthly records suggest that extreme anomalies on the cold side were particularly concentrated in that decade, just as warm extremes were concentrated in the 1930s.