As advertised by computer forecasts from the middle of last week, clear skies and calm winds have allowed temperatures to drop off sharply over the central and eastern interior. At the surface there is a 1030 mb high across north-central Alaska, but at upper levels the dominant feature is not high pressure but a cold low over the western Beaufort Sea.
The lowest temperature observation I've seen so far is -55F at the Granite Creek SNOTEL just east of Delta Junction, but there were many other worthy contenders including:
-53F Huslia
-53F Coldfoot SNOTEL
-53F Arctic Village
-52F Bettles airport
Here's a delightful webcam photo from Arctic Village this afternoon: -49F and some light ice fog.
In the Fairbanks area, -43F was reached at the airport, the coldest in nearly two years. Fort Wainwright reached -48 and Eielson -47.
Yesterday afternoon's balloon sounding revealed deep cold with only a slight inversion (prior to the overnight surface cooling). The column maximum temperature was -26.5 C, which is again the coldest in nearly two years. It's interesting to compare this sounding with the coldest of this winter prior to last Wednesday (as measured by 1000-500 mb thickness): see below.
Objective Comments and Analysis - All Science, No Politics
Primary Author Richard James
2010-2013 Author Rick Thoman
Monday, January 26, 2015
Saturday, January 24, 2015
Decreasing Extremes
With potentially much below normal temperatures possible in the next few days in the central and eastern interior (latest MOS number -65 °F for Fort Yukon on Tuesday), I started to wonder about historical changes in the frequency of large temperature anomalies. We know that cold extremes are less common in winter now, even relative to the warmer modern "normal", but what about warm extremes - have these become more or less common?
The chart below is a histogram of the daily temperature anomalies in November through March in Fairbanks, for two 30-year periods: 1931-1960 and 1981-2010. In each case I compared the daily mean temperatures to the daily normal values for the 30-year period in question, so this is a straightforward comparison of daily temperatures to the contemporary climate normal. The results show that large anomalies were noticeably less common in the 1981-2010 period than in 1931-1960, and that the decrease in extremes occurred on both the warm and cold sides.
In the extreme tails of the distribution, there was a large proportional decrease in frequency of daily anomalies greater than +/- 40 °F. On the cold side, anomalies more than 40 °F below normal decreased from 0.95% of days to 0.22 % of days, and on the warm side the frequency of +40 °F anomalies decreased from 0.48% to 0.13% of days. The chart below shows the numbers of days by decade that saw +/- 40 °F anomalies on either side. As noted in earlier posts, the 1930s was an extreme time for Fairbanks climate.
The decrease in temperature variance over time in Fairbanks was previously noted in Brian's analysis here.
As an aside, a corresponding analysis for the warm months of the year does not show the same decrease in extremes (see below); in fact the 1990's was the decade with the highest frequency of daily anomalies greater than+/- 15 °F.
The chart below is a histogram of the daily temperature anomalies in November through March in Fairbanks, for two 30-year periods: 1931-1960 and 1981-2010. In each case I compared the daily mean temperatures to the daily normal values for the 30-year period in question, so this is a straightforward comparison of daily temperatures to the contemporary climate normal. The results show that large anomalies were noticeably less common in the 1981-2010 period than in 1931-1960, and that the decrease in extremes occurred on both the warm and cold sides.
In the extreme tails of the distribution, there was a large proportional decrease in frequency of daily anomalies greater than +/- 40 °F. On the cold side, anomalies more than 40 °F below normal decreased from 0.95% of days to 0.22 % of days, and on the warm side the frequency of +40 °F anomalies decreased from 0.48% to 0.13% of days. The chart below shows the numbers of days by decade that saw +/- 40 °F anomalies on either side. As noted in earlier posts, the 1930s was an extreme time for Fairbanks climate.
The decrease in temperature variance over time in Fairbanks was previously noted in Brian's analysis here.
As an aside, a corresponding analysis for the warm months of the year does not show the same decrease in extremes (see below); in fact the 1990's was the decade with the highest frequency of daily anomalies greater than
Friday, January 23, 2015
Getting Wintry
The coldest temperatures of the winter so far in Alaska were observed this morning, with the -50 °F level broken for the first time to my knowledge: -51 °F was reported at Huslia in the lower Koyukuk River valley. The infrared satellite image below, taken at 3:53 am AKST this morning, shows the areas that cooled off under clear skies in the western interior: dark shades are colder, and Huslia is located close to the prominent dark patch in the upper center of the image.
In contrast, heavy cloud cover has so far kept temperatures relatively milder in the eastern interior, although Arctic air has been working its way in at low levels despite the blanket of clouds. The frontal zone aloft over Fairbanks created a band of snow today that became quite narrow and fairly intense as it persisted just east of the city (see below); a storm total of 7.7" was reported from North Pole as of 4:42pm. This kind of "mesoscale" feature is nearly impossible to predict more than a few hours ahead of time but makes a great difference for total snowfall amounts.
As clouds and moisture migrate eastward in the next couple of days, and high pressure builds across the north, the cold conditions already observed in the west will envelop the central and eastern interior. This morning's GFS MOS forecast numbers were remarkably cold, including -49 °F at Fairbanks airport and -50's at various locations along the Tanana River valley on Monday or Tuesday. Readers can track the latest MOS (statistical) forecast temperatures at the following page:
http://www.worldagweather.com/alaska/mos.php
In contrast, heavy cloud cover has so far kept temperatures relatively milder in the eastern interior, although Arctic air has been working its way in at low levels despite the blanket of clouds. The frontal zone aloft over Fairbanks created a band of snow today that became quite narrow and fairly intense as it persisted just east of the city (see below); a storm total of 7.7" was reported from North Pole as of 4:42pm. This kind of "mesoscale" feature is nearly impossible to predict more than a few hours ahead of time but makes a great difference for total snowfall amounts.
As clouds and moisture migrate eastward in the next couple of days, and high pressure builds across the north, the cold conditions already observed in the west will envelop the central and eastern interior. This morning's GFS MOS forecast numbers were remarkably cold, including -49 °F at Fairbanks airport and -50's at various locations along the Tanana River valley on Monday or Tuesday. Readers can track the latest MOS (statistical) forecast temperatures at the following page:
http://www.worldagweather.com/alaska/mos.php
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Turning Colder
This afternoon's balloon sounding from Fairbanks measured a column maximum temperature of +9 °F, which is - remarkably - the coldest such measurement of the season so far. Much colder conditions are on the way; western Alaska is feeling a chill already, with Kotzebue reporting a stiff northwesterly breeze and temperatures hovering around -6 °F all day.
In what will be a nice change of scene both for residents and this blogger, we should have some material to discuss on the cold side in the next week or so. Latest GFS MOS numbers for next Tuesday include -36 °F in Fairbanks, -48 °F in Eagle, and -59 °F in Chicken. This is a long-range forecast, but gives a sense of what is easily possible given the cold airmass and the date on the calendar.
Here's this afternoon's sounding: at last, just a smidge cooler than normal at 850 mb.
In what will be a nice change of scene both for residents and this blogger, we should have some material to discuss on the cold side in the next week or so. Latest GFS MOS numbers for next Tuesday include -36 °F in Fairbanks, -48 °F in Eagle, and -59 °F in Chicken. This is a long-range forecast, but gives a sense of what is easily possible given the cold airmass and the date on the calendar.
Here's this afternoon's sounding: at last, just a smidge cooler than normal at 850 mb.
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
More on Warmth Aloft
Recently there's been much attention given to the fact that - according to the National Climatic Data Center - 2014 was the warmest year on record in Alaska. This verdict is based on surface station measurements, but is also consistent with record warmth aloft as observed by balloon soundings. For instance, we can look at the 1000-500 mb thickness, which is an excellent measure of the average temperature of the lower half of the atmosphere; we find that the 2014 mean 1000-500 mb thickness was higher than in any other year (1948-present) in Fairbanks, Barrow, and Kotzebue. The thickness was second only to 1957 in Nome, McGrath, Bethel, and Anchorage.
One question that arose in my mind when pondering these new records was whether there were any 365-day periods in the past that were warmer than the calendar year 2014; after all, calendar year boundaries are artificial, like week or month boundaries throughout the year. So I calculated the running 365-day mean 1000-500 mb thickness in Fairbanks and found that - remarkably - the highest values on record occurred in the past week. Here's a list of the top several 365-day means with data complete through today (January 20); the top 61 overlapping periods ended in 2014 or 2015, and next in line was the year ending February 7, 1994.
One question that arose in my mind when pondering these new records was whether there were any 365-day periods in the past that were warmer than the calendar year 2014; after all, calendar year boundaries are artificial, like week or month boundaries throughout the year. So I calculated the running 365-day mean 1000-500 mb thickness in Fairbanks and found that - remarkably - the highest values on record occurred in the past week. Here's a list of the top several 365-day means with data complete through today (January 20); the top 61 overlapping periods ended in 2014 or 2015, and next in line was the year ending February 7, 1994.
Jan 17, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 5344.20 m
Jan 18, 2014 - Jan 17, 2015 5344.15 m
Jan 16, 2014 - Jan 15, 2015 5343.83 m
Jan 19, 2014 - Jan 18, 2015 5343.63 m
Jan 20, 2014 - Jan 19, 2015 5343.62 m
Jan 21, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015 5343.44 m
Jan 21, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015 5343.44 m
Jan 15, 2014 - Jan 14, 2015 5343.23 m
May 21, 2013 - May 20, 2014 5343.03 m
...
Feb 8, 1993 - Feb 7, 1994 5338.53 m
Sunday, January 18, 2015
Warmest Winter To Date
The mean temperature in Fairbanks since November 1 has now moved into first place in the historical rankings since 1930; in other words, if we define winter as November-March, then this is now the warmest winter on record through January 17. The winter-to-date temperature now exceeds that of 2002-2003 by the slimmest of margins.
[Update: Brian coincidentally made a similar graphic, and his analysis shows that the winter of 1928-29 was warmer through January 17. This is helpful context for the current warmth. It's a matter of personal preference as to whether to include pre-1930 data in this kind of analysis - I usually don't do so, because the Weather Bureau/NWS era began in December 1929 and I have greater confidence in the quality of the Fairbanks data since then. Rick Thoman went so far as to say that pre-1930 data from Fairbanks are "plagued by data quality issues", although this may apply more to pre-1920 data. My own (relatively uninformed) opinion is that there's very useful information to be gleaned from the early years, but the data should be used with caution.]
The chart below shows the evolution of the winter-to-date mean temperature this year in red, compared to 2002-3 in blue and the historical range in gray. This winter has been steadily climbing through the rankings as warmth at the surface has become increasingly anomalous. We can see that mean daily temperatures close to +10 °F would be required to maintain first position for the remainder of winter; this would be more than 15 °F above normal for late January, so it will be a challenge to hold onto the record in the near-term. In fact, we're very likely to fall back out of first place in the coming days, as January 2003 had a very warm spell around the 20th.
[Update: Brian coincidentally made a similar graphic, and his analysis shows that the winter of 1928-29 was warmer through January 17. This is helpful context for the current warmth. It's a matter of personal preference as to whether to include pre-1930 data in this kind of analysis - I usually don't do so, because the Weather Bureau/NWS era began in December 1929 and I have greater confidence in the quality of the Fairbanks data since then. Rick Thoman went so far as to say that pre-1930 data from Fairbanks are "plagued by data quality issues", although this may apply more to pre-1920 data. My own (relatively uninformed) opinion is that there's very useful information to be gleaned from the early years, but the data should be used with caution.]
Friday, January 16, 2015
Gulkana and Fairbanks Temperatures
Reader Gary inquired last week about temperatures in Glennallen and their relationship to Fairbanks temperatures. The two locations are separated by more than 200 miles and the Alaska Range, but the climates are quite similar; both locations are strongly continental, with very large temperature swings from summer to winter. In the case of Glennallen this is possible because of the Chugach Mountains to the south, which block Pacific moisture despite the ocean being less than 100 miles away. In fact Glennallen is surrounded on all sides by high terrain, being located in the Copper River Basin, and this allows relatively clear, calm and cold conditions to prevail rather frequently in winter.
The chart below shows the 1981-2010 daily normal temperatures for the Gulkana airport, which is just a few miles from Glennallen, and for the Fairbanks airport. Fairbanks sees a somewhat larger swing from summer to winter, but overall the large seasonal variations are similar. Peak summer temperatures occur a few weeks later in Gulkana, which reflects a slightly greater maritime influence in the more southerly location.
We can get a sense of the variability in temperatures by looking at histograms of daily maximum and minimum temperature for summer and winter, see below. Starting with winter, the charts show that the Fairbanks temperature distribution is shifted towards the cold side compared to Gulkana, but variability is similar. Above-freezing temperatures are about twice as common in Gulkana in December through February (10.8% of days vs 5.7%) for the overlapping period of record. Conversely, temperatures of -40° or below are nearly twice as common in Fairbanks in December through February (11.8% of days vs 6.8%).
In high summer (June and July), the differences between the two locations are more significant compared to the range of temperatures observed at that time of year. As shown in the charts below, Gulkana is quite a bit cooler, especially for the daily minimum temperatures. Minimum temperatures are generally in the 40s in Gulkana, but are more often above 50 °F than below 50 °F in Fairbanks. In Gulkana, daily high temperatures most often fall in the range 60-75 °F, but Fairbanks is typically in the range 65-80 °F.
The cooler temperatures overall in Gulkana can be explained partly by the higher elevation (1560' vs 430' MSL). Cooler nights in particular are the result of lower humidity: Gulkana's average dewpoint in June and July is 41 °F, compared to 47 °F in Fairbanks. Accordingly, Gulkana is about 10 percent drier in terms of June-July precipitation. Longer nights may also play a role in nighttime coolness: the sun is below the horizon for at least 4 hours every night in summer in Gulkana.
Lastly, I'll touch on the correlation of temperature variations in the two locations. The list below shows the correlation coefficients between the two locations for daily temperature departures from normal, based on the 1981-2010 normals and calculated over the common period of record (1943-2014). Correlations are highest in winter and spring, and are relatively low in late summer when it appears that local variations in cloudiness have a large effect compared to the underlying temperature variance.
Jan +0.77
Feb +0.76
Mar +0.74
Apr +0.74
May +0.71
Jun +0.66
Jul +0.53
Aug +0.62
Sep +0.65
Oct +0.68
Nov +0.76
Dec +0.76
The chart below shows the 1981-2010 daily normal temperatures for the Gulkana airport, which is just a few miles from Glennallen, and for the Fairbanks airport. Fairbanks sees a somewhat larger swing from summer to winter, but overall the large seasonal variations are similar. Peak summer temperatures occur a few weeks later in Gulkana, which reflects a slightly greater maritime influence in the more southerly location.
In high summer (June and July), the differences between the two locations are more significant compared to the range of temperatures observed at that time of year. As shown in the charts below, Gulkana is quite a bit cooler, especially for the daily minimum temperatures. Minimum temperatures are generally in the 40s in Gulkana, but are more often above 50 °F than below 50 °F in Fairbanks. In Gulkana, daily high temperatures most often fall in the range 60-75 °F, but Fairbanks is typically in the range 65-80 °F.
The cooler temperatures overall in Gulkana can be explained partly by the higher elevation (1560' vs 430' MSL). Cooler nights in particular are the result of lower humidity: Gulkana's average dewpoint in June and July is 41 °F, compared to 47 °F in Fairbanks. Accordingly, Gulkana is about 10 percent drier in terms of June-July precipitation. Longer nights may also play a role in nighttime coolness: the sun is below the horizon for at least 4 hours every night in summer in Gulkana.
Lastly, I'll touch on the correlation of temperature variations in the two locations. The list below shows the correlation coefficients between the two locations for daily temperature departures from normal, based on the 1981-2010 normals and calculated over the common period of record (1943-2014). Correlations are highest in winter and spring, and are relatively low in late summer when it appears that local variations in cloudiness have a large effect compared to the underlying temperature variance.
Jan +0.77
Feb +0.76
Mar +0.74
Apr +0.74
May +0.71
Jun +0.66
Jul +0.53
Aug +0.62
Sep +0.65
Oct +0.68
Nov +0.76
Dec +0.76
Tuesday, January 13, 2015
Low Snow in the Northwest
One of the many notable climate anomalies in Alaska this winter is a lack of snowfall in many locations, and even Kotzebue in the northwest is suffering in this regard. So far this winter, only 8.1 inches has fallen in Kotzebue, and the snow depth has been stuck at a meager 2 inches since November 27, after peaking earlier at 4 inches.
The only other winter with such a low snow depth in January was 2012-2013; that winter saw an even more extreme snow drought in the early going, but the snow depth then reached 5" on January 12 and 9" on January 15. So this winter now has the distinction of the lowest peak snow depth through this date. In a couple of days we'll also break the record for latest date to first reach 6" snow depth (January 14, 2013); the median date is November 17.
Here's a chart of the season-to-date snowfall and peak snow depth since 1949. (I'm not sure how the snow depth exceeded the snow total in 1994-95 and 1999-2000, but that's what the data say.) It's interesting to note the high volatility in snow totals in recent decades and especially in the last 5 years or so.
Why the lack of snow? The answer is that a blocking ridge over the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska has prevented cyclonic storm systems from reaching Kotzebue. The six maps below show the sea-level pressure anomaly (left column) and 500 mb height anomaly (right column) in October, November, and December of 2014; notice the general lack of low pressure in the north.
The recent flow pattern can be contrasted with the situation in a very snowy month: below are the maps for the snowiest early winter month in Kotzebue's history, November 2003 (46 inches):
It's interesting to note that Nome is not doing too badly for snow this winter, with 27.1" season-to-date and a current snow depth of 11". Seasonal snowfall totals are correlated at only +0.42 between Kotzebue and Nome, so this isn't too surprising; but it does appear that Nome has done fairly well out of an unfavorable upper-air pattern.
The only other winter with such a low snow depth in January was 2012-2013; that winter saw an even more extreme snow drought in the early going, but the snow depth then reached 5" on January 12 and 9" on January 15. So this winter now has the distinction of the lowest peak snow depth through this date. In a couple of days we'll also break the record for latest date to first reach 6" snow depth (January 14, 2013); the median date is November 17.
Here's a chart of the season-to-date snowfall and peak snow depth since 1949. (I'm not sure how the snow depth exceeded the snow total in 1994-95 and 1999-2000, but that's what the data say.) It's interesting to note the high volatility in snow totals in recent decades and especially in the last 5 years or so.
Why the lack of snow? The answer is that a blocking ridge over the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska has prevented cyclonic storm systems from reaching Kotzebue. The six maps below show the sea-level pressure anomaly (left column) and 500 mb height anomaly (right column) in October, November, and December of 2014; notice the general lack of low pressure in the north.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recent flow pattern can be contrasted with the situation in a very snowy month: below are the maps for the snowiest early winter month in Kotzebue's history, November 2003 (46 inches):
|
|
|
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Warmth Aloft and Wind Direction
After reading Richard's excellent post the other day, I though it would be interesting to see if cyclical patterns exist in the direction of winds coming into Alaska. Richard also looked at Barrow's upper level wind direction as it related to Autumnal warming along the North Slope. This is a complementary post to those articles.
Most of Alaska has seen substantial surface warming in the winter months during the last few decades. The warmth has been well documented in numerous books, articles, and reports. The cause of this increase in warmth is multifaceted and is not the subject of this analysis. One of the frequent responses to observed temperature increases is to question station siting and the effects of urbanization and landcover changes. One way to see if the observed surface temperature increase is a "real" or an artifact of the measurement technique is to look at air temperatures recorded from weather balloons (RAOBs) just above the surface. This blog posts looks at the case of Anchorage, Alaska, and whether the surface temperature increase corresponds to a free-air temperature increase. I know that this blog generally focuses on interior conditions but since the data were handy for Anchorage and since the effects are fairly uniform over large areas, it seems appropriate to go with Southcentral data in this case. I will look at Fairbanks data as time permits.
Surface Temperatures
An inspection of annual temperatures in Anchorage (see Figure 1) shows an obvious increase over the course of the climate record. It is worth remembering that the temperatures since 1953 represents the Anchorage International Airport location and before 1953 it represents a combination of Merrill Field, the Park Strip, and Ship Creek locations. Note the shift in temperature regime in the mid-1970s.
Since temperatures are much more variable in winter than in summer, annual swings in temperatures are often reflected in the temperatures during the cold months of the year. For example, December or January can be +/- 15°F compared to normal but July or August cannot be more than about 5°F from normal. Figure 2 shows the December-January temperature in Anchorage for the length of the climate record. Note the high degree of correlation between the lines in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Upper Air Temperatures
At high latitudes, low level temperatures are often dominated by a cold-pocket of air at the surface. This is referred to as a temperature inversion. This cold pocket of air often masks the presence of a change in airmass. Since cold air at the surface is difficult to displace, you can have a situation where an old airmass is present at the surface and a new airmass is present a few thousand feet above the surface. Sun angle, wind speed, and proximity to mountains determine the time lag between the length of time that an airmass change is reflected at the surface. Many times, the airmass changes several times without being noticed at the surface. Therefore, any study of temperature changes must also look at upper air temperatures so as to eliminate the problem of temperature inversions. For this study, we are going to use the 850 mb level (~5,000') as a proxy for free-air temperatures. All weather balloons launched in Anchorage since 1948 have sampled the air temperature at 850 mb and reported the height, temperature, dewpoint depression, wind speed, and wind direction. Figure 4 shows the the annual 850 mb (~5,000') temperature at Anchorage since 1948 and Figure 5 shows December-January temperatures only.
Figure 5. December-January 850 mb temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, from 1948 to 2014.
The temperature increase at 850 mb is both noticeable and statistically significant. However, the magnitude is slightly less than observed at the surface. Note that the units for Figures 1 and 2 are degrees Fahrenheit and the units for Figures 4 and 5 are degrees Celsius. As we did with surface temperatures, we show the daily normal 850 mb temperatures for all 30-year periods in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Daily normal temperature for Anchorage at 850 mb for all 30-year periods beginning with the 1951-1980 time period.
A side-by-side comparison of Figures 3 and 6 shows a similar, dramatic increase in wintertime temperatures in Anchorage. At the surface, January temperature have increased about 7°F since the 1950s and the 850 mb temp has increase by as much as 1.9°C (3.4°F). The 7°F surface increase from the 1950s is equivalent to 0.55 standard deviations above the normal value at the time. The 1.9°C increase in December-January 850 mb temps is equivalent to 0.35 standard deviations above the normal value at the time.
The Role of Wind
When the airmass south of Alaska is advected northward from the sub-tropics, warm conditions ensue. Indeed, this winter has seen a never ending stream of warm air from the central North Pacific Ocean move into Alaska bringing warm air with it. Is this the case for all warm winters? The reason we spent so long introducing the upper air conditions in the previous section is because an airmass moving from the south to the north is often not apparent in the surface wind observations – but it clearly shows up in the 850 mb wind observation. Therefore, let us take a look at how the winds at 850 mb blow during warm or cold years.
Figure 8. Scatter plot showing December-January 850 mb temps with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Anchorage, Alaska.
Looking at individual seasons instead of decades, the relationship between wind direction and 850 mb temperatures in December and January is easier to see. Figure 8 shows a scatter plot of December-January 850 mb temps and the percentage of observations with southeasterly winds. The R-square correlation is still very high. Similarly, there is a strong negative correlation between 850 mb temperatures and the percentage of time winds are coming from the north. Figure 9 displays the strength of this correlation.
Figure 9. Scatter plot showing December-January 850 mb temps with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the north at Anchorage, Alaska.
Conclusion
There is a clearly defined relationship between warm winter temperatures in Anchorage (at the surface and at 850 mb) and the prevailing wind direction. This should not come as a surprise to anyone. Air from south of Alaska is obviously warmer than air from north of Alaska.
Figure 10. Percentage of December-January 850 mb wind observations from the southeast at Anchorage, Alaska..
What is surprising is the increased frequency of 850 mb winds originating from the south and southeast. Figure 10 shows the long-term trend of the percentage of 850 mb observations with a southeast wind. The question becomes why? The answer to why is not so easy. Southeast winds at 850 mb imply a low pressure center in the Gulf of Alaska. Are Gulf lows becoming more common? Are they becoming more intense? One of the more talked about climate drivers in Alaska is the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. Using University of Washington data, we can show that years with positive PDO values indeed have a larger percentage of 850 millibar southeast wind observations.
Figure 11. Scatter plot showing December-January Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index values with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Anchorage, Alaska.
Figure 12. ESRL Reanalysis of sea level pressure change between the 1981-2010 period and the 1951-1980 period.
How does all of this affect air pressure patterns? Since the pressure-gradient force drives winds, the air pressure regime should tell us a lot about the wind magnitude and direction. Figure 12 clearly shows that air pressure has been lower in the Bering Sea and the Aleutian Islands during the more recent 30-year normal period. This confirms the hypothesis that lower pressures are more frequent or more intense in a geographical position that promotes southerly air flow. Still, this does not answer the why question. Does the decrease in sea ice affect the pressure patterns? What about the Pacific Decadal Oscillation? This is obvious a question of great importance to Alaskans and an active area of research.
*****************************
Supplemental Figures for Fairbanks
Figure S1. Annual 850 mb temperature in Fairbanks, Alaska, from 1948 to 2014.
Figure S5. Scatter plot showing December-January 850 mb temps with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Fairbanks, Alaska.
Figure S6. Scatter plot showing December-January Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index values with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Fairbanks, Alaska.
Most of Alaska has seen substantial surface warming in the winter months during the last few decades. The warmth has been well documented in numerous books, articles, and reports. The cause of this increase in warmth is multifaceted and is not the subject of this analysis. One of the frequent responses to observed temperature increases is to question station siting and the effects of urbanization and landcover changes. One way to see if the observed surface temperature increase is a "real" or an artifact of the measurement technique is to look at air temperatures recorded from weather balloons (RAOBs) just above the surface. This blog posts looks at the case of Anchorage, Alaska, and whether the surface temperature increase corresponds to a free-air temperature increase. I know that this blog generally focuses on interior conditions but since the data were handy for Anchorage and since the effects are fairly uniform over large areas, it seems appropriate to go with Southcentral data in this case. I will look at Fairbanks data as time permits.
Surface Temperatures
An inspection of annual temperatures in Anchorage (see Figure 1) shows an obvious increase over the course of the climate record. It is worth remembering that the temperatures since 1953 represents the Anchorage International Airport location and before 1953 it represents a combination of Merrill Field, the Park Strip, and Ship Creek locations. Note the shift in temperature regime in the mid-1970s.
Figure 1. Annual temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, from 1916 to 2014. Several years in the 1920s has too many missing observations for inclusion.
Since temperatures are much more variable in winter than in summer, annual swings in temperatures are often reflected in the temperatures during the cold months of the year. For example, December or January can be +/- 15°F compared to normal but July or August cannot be more than about 5°F from normal. Figure 2 shows the December-January temperature in Anchorage for the length of the climate record. Note the high degree of correlation between the lines in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Figure 2. December-January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, from 1916 to 2014.
If we use standard 30-year periods to calculate long-term normals, as NCDC and WMO does, the difference in temperatures over time is readily apparent. Figure 3 shows all 30-year daily normals since the 1921-1950 time period. The large increase in winter temperatures are clearly evident.
Figure 3. Daily normal temperature for Anchorage for all 30-year periods beginning with the 1921-1950 time period.
Upper Air Temperatures
At high latitudes, low level temperatures are often dominated by a cold-pocket of air at the surface. This is referred to as a temperature inversion. This cold pocket of air often masks the presence of a change in airmass. Since cold air at the surface is difficult to displace, you can have a situation where an old airmass is present at the surface and a new airmass is present a few thousand feet above the surface. Sun angle, wind speed, and proximity to mountains determine the time lag between the length of time that an airmass change is reflected at the surface. Many times, the airmass changes several times without being noticed at the surface. Therefore, any study of temperature changes must also look at upper air temperatures so as to eliminate the problem of temperature inversions. For this study, we are going to use the 850 mb level (~5,000') as a proxy for free-air temperatures. All weather balloons launched in Anchorage since 1948 have sampled the air temperature at 850 mb and reported the height, temperature, dewpoint depression, wind speed, and wind direction. Figure 4 shows the the annual 850 mb (~5,000') temperature at Anchorage since 1948 and Figure 5 shows December-January temperatures only.
Figure 4. Annual 850 mb temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, from 1948 to 2014.
The temperature increase at 850 mb is both noticeable and statistically significant. However, the magnitude is slightly less than observed at the surface. Note that the units for Figures 1 and 2 are degrees Fahrenheit and the units for Figures 4 and 5 are degrees Celsius. As we did with surface temperatures, we show the daily normal 850 mb temperatures for all 30-year periods in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Daily normal temperature for Anchorage at 850 mb for all 30-year periods beginning with the 1951-1980 time period.
A side-by-side comparison of Figures 3 and 6 shows a similar, dramatic increase in wintertime temperatures in Anchorage. At the surface, January temperature have increased about 7°F since the 1950s and the 850 mb temp has increase by as much as 1.9°C (3.4°F). The 7°F surface increase from the 1950s is equivalent to 0.55 standard deviations above the normal value at the time. The 1.9°C increase in December-January 850 mb temps is equivalent to 0.35 standard deviations above the normal value at the time.
The Role of Wind
When the airmass south of Alaska is advected northward from the sub-tropics, warm conditions ensue. Indeed, this winter has seen a never ending stream of warm air from the central North Pacific Ocean move into Alaska bringing warm air with it. Is this the case for all warm winters? The reason we spent so long introducing the upper air conditions in the previous section is because an airmass moving from the south to the north is often not apparent in the surface wind observations – but it clearly shows up in the 850 mb wind observation. Therefore, let us take a look at how the winds at 850 mb blow during warm or cold years.
Figure 7. Frequency distribution of December-January wind direction at 850 mb by decade. Inset chart shows the average 850 mb temperature by decade.
Figure 7 shows the cardinal wind direction by decade for the Anchorage balloon station at 850 mb for only the months of December and January. Since those two months showed the most dramatic surface and 850 mb warming, it is entirely possible that southerly winds might be correlated with the increase in winter temperatures. The chart shows a notable increase in southeasterly and southerly winds at 850 mb over time. There is a corresponding drop in the amount of time with northerly and northeasterly winds during these two months. The R-square value between 850 mb temp and the percentage of 850 mb southeasterly winds by decade (Figure 7) is 0.64. Therefore, we can conclude that a fair amount of the upper air warming during the winter months is due to an increase in southerly winds which advect warmer air from lower latitudes.
Figure 8. Scatter plot showing December-January 850 mb temps with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Anchorage, Alaska.
Looking at individual seasons instead of decades, the relationship between wind direction and 850 mb temperatures in December and January is easier to see. Figure 8 shows a scatter plot of December-January 850 mb temps and the percentage of observations with southeasterly winds. The R-square correlation is still very high. Similarly, there is a strong negative correlation between 850 mb temperatures and the percentage of time winds are coming from the north. Figure 9 displays the strength of this correlation.
Figure 9. Scatter plot showing December-January 850 mb temps with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the north at Anchorage, Alaska.
Conclusion
There is a clearly defined relationship between warm winter temperatures in Anchorage (at the surface and at 850 mb) and the prevailing wind direction. This should not come as a surprise to anyone. Air from south of Alaska is obviously warmer than air from north of Alaska.
Figure 10. Percentage of December-January 850 mb wind observations from the southeast at Anchorage, Alaska..
What is surprising is the increased frequency of 850 mb winds originating from the south and southeast. Figure 10 shows the long-term trend of the percentage of 850 mb observations with a southeast wind. The question becomes why? The answer to why is not so easy. Southeast winds at 850 mb imply a low pressure center in the Gulf of Alaska. Are Gulf lows becoming more common? Are they becoming more intense? One of the more talked about climate drivers in Alaska is the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. Using University of Washington data, we can show that years with positive PDO values indeed have a larger percentage of 850 millibar southeast wind observations.
Figure 11. Scatter plot showing December-January Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index values with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Anchorage, Alaska.
Figure 12. ESRL Reanalysis of sea level pressure change between the 1981-2010 period and the 1951-1980 period.
How does all of this affect air pressure patterns? Since the pressure-gradient force drives winds, the air pressure regime should tell us a lot about the wind magnitude and direction. Figure 12 clearly shows that air pressure has been lower in the Bering Sea and the Aleutian Islands during the more recent 30-year normal period. This confirms the hypothesis that lower pressures are more frequent or more intense in a geographical position that promotes southerly air flow. Still, this does not answer the why question. Does the decrease in sea ice affect the pressure patterns? What about the Pacific Decadal Oscillation? This is obvious a question of great importance to Alaskans and an active area of research.
*****************************
Supplemental Figures for Fairbanks
Figure S2. December-January 850 mb temperature in Fairbanks, Alaska, from 1948 to 2014.
Figure S3. Percentage of December-January 850 mb wind observations from the southeast at Fairbanks, Alaska.
Figure S4. Percentage of December-January 850 mb wind observations from the south at Fairbanks, Alaska.
Figure S6. Scatter plot showing December-January Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index values with the percentage of time December-January 850 mb winds are from the southeast at Fairbanks, Alaska.
Thursday, January 8, 2015
PDO Influence Aloft
Tuesday's post on the persistent warmth aloft above Fairbanks (despite recent chill at the surface) sparked the question of how the PDO affects temperatures at different elevations. This is a question that deserves more detailed investigation that I can give it now, but a simple chart tells the tale for early winter: see below. The colored lines on the chart show the mean temperature for the November-December period at 500, 700, and 850 mb, for each year since 1948, and the black columns show the November-December mean PDO index.
The high correlation between temperatures at various levels in the lower half of the atmosphere is clearly evident, and it's also plain that the PDO has a strong connection to temperatures even up at 500 mb (~18000 feet). Here are the Pearson correlation coefficients between the November-December PDO index and temperature:
Surface: +0.65
850 mb: +0.72
700 mb: +0.67
500 mb: +0.50
Interestingly the correlations are slightly higher at 850 and 700 mb than at the surface, and the correlation remains a fairly robust +0.50 at 500 mb.
The deep and coherent nature of the warm air over Fairbanks since the start of winter is illustrated by a time-height cross-section of temperature anomalies for the lowest 3000 m (see below). It's clear that the recent cold spell at the surface was a very shallow phenomenon; warmth continues unabated aloft. In fact, temperatures have warmed dramatically again in the past 24 hours, and this afternoon's balloon sounding reported a temperature of +7.6 °C at 850 mb, which is 19.2 °C above normal. This is just about the greatest warm anomaly seen so far this winter at 850 mb (+19.8 °C was seen in November).
The high correlation between temperatures at various levels in the lower half of the atmosphere is clearly evident, and it's also plain that the PDO has a strong connection to temperatures even up at 500 mb (~18000 feet). Here are the Pearson correlation coefficients between the November-December PDO index and temperature:
Surface: +0.65
850 mb: +0.72
700 mb: +0.67
500 mb: +0.50
Interestingly the correlations are slightly higher at 850 and 700 mb than at the surface, and the correlation remains a fairly robust +0.50 at 500 mb.
The deep and coherent nature of the warm air over Fairbanks since the start of winter is illustrated by a time-height cross-section of temperature anomalies for the lowest 3000 m (see below). It's clear that the recent cold spell at the surface was a very shallow phenomenon; warmth continues unabated aloft. In fact, temperatures have warmed dramatically again in the past 24 hours, and this afternoon's balloon sounding reported a temperature of +7.6 °C at 850 mb, which is 19.2 °C above normal. This is just about the greatest warm anomaly seen so far this winter at 850 mb (+19.8 °C was seen in November).
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
Warmth Aloft Persists
Valley locations in the Fairbanks area continue to see cold and stagnant conditions under high pressure, but temperatures aloft are much warmer, resulting in a strong inversion. Yesterday evening saw a temperature of -31 °F at Goldstream Creek and +9 °F on Keystone Ridge, a difference of 40 °F in a short distance. Farther aloft, the temperature measured by balloon sounding yesterday afternoon was as high as +18 °F at 869 mb or 3766 feet above ground level; and other soundings have been even warmer in recent days.
Another way of expressing the extreme persistence of warmth this winter is that only two soundings so far have observed a column colder than -10 °C throughout (back in November). The next closest winter in this regard is 2000-2001, with 13 soundings colder than -10 °C by the turn of the year, and even the exceptionally warm early winter of 2002 had 22 soundings meeting this threshold of cold.
The persistent absence of cold conditions aloft has been a very prominent feature of the winter in Fairbanks so far, and in fact it's record-breaking by quite a large margin. The chart below shows the lowest observed value of the column maximum temperature in the early winter, i.e. prior to the turn of the year, for each year since 1948. Remarkably, this winter's balloon soundings from Fairbanks have not yet observed a column colder than -11.1 °C (+12 °F) throughout the troposphere; there has always been air at least this warm at some level. The previous record in this respect was -18.5 °C (-1 °F) in 1953. The chart shows an interesting pattern of rising minima in recent decades, indicating that this year's outcome is a continuation of a long-term trend.
Another way of expressing the extreme persistence of warmth this winter is that only two soundings so far have observed a column colder than -10 °C throughout (back in November). The next closest winter in this regard is 2000-2001, with 13 soundings colder than -10 °C by the turn of the year, and even the exceptionally warm early winter of 2002 had 22 soundings meeting this threshold of cold.
Monday, January 5, 2015
Cold At Last
The coldest weather of the season arrived for much of interior Alaska over the weekend, and this morning the COOP site at Chicken reached -50 °F. As far as I'm aware, this was the first observed -50 °F temperature in the state this winter. This depth of winter cold is typically reached by mid-December somewhere in the state (1950-2013 median December 6, 1976-2013 median December 14). Other chilly readings from today include:
-44F Bettles SNOTEL
-43F Fort Yukon RAWS
-41F Tok AKTAS RAWS
-38F Northway
-36F Ruby 44ESE CRN
It's interesting to note that in 17 winters of reasonably complete data, the Chicken COOP has never failed to reach -50 °F at some point. The median for lowest winter temperature is -63 °F, and this even beats Alaska's winter pole of cold, Umiat (median of -59 °F). In this connection I'll refer back to a classic post by Rick concerning the coldest spot in the state:
http://ak-wx.blogspot.com/2012/11/where-is-coldest-place-in-alaska.html
The coldest so far today at Fairbanks airport is -30 °F, and the daily high will probably be -22 °F, making this the first substantially (more than 1 standard deviation) colder than normal day since early October.
It took a long time, but the Tanana River at Nenana finally appears to be completely frozen over today; open water was still visible from the Ice Classic webcam just a couple of days ago.
-44F Bettles SNOTEL
-43F Fort Yukon RAWS
-41F Tok AKTAS RAWS
-38F Northway
-36F Ruby 44ESE CRN
It's interesting to note that in 17 winters of reasonably complete data, the Chicken COOP has never failed to reach -50 °F at some point. The median for lowest winter temperature is -63 °F, and this even beats Alaska's winter pole of cold, Umiat (median of -59 °F). In this connection I'll refer back to a classic post by Rick concerning the coldest spot in the state:
http://ak-wx.blogspot.com/2012/11/where-is-coldest-place-in-alaska.html
The coldest so far today at Fairbanks airport is -30 °F, and the daily high will probably be -22 °F, making this the first substantially (more than 1 standard deviation) colder than normal day since early October.
It took a long time, but the Tanana River at Nenana finally appears to be completely frozen over today; open water was still visible from the Ice Classic webcam just a couple of days ago.
Friday, January 2, 2015
AMO Climate Influence
I recently looked at the influence of the PDO phase on Fairbanks temperatures throughout the year, and so I thought it would be interesting to see if there is any discernible influence of the well-known multi-decadal temperature oscillation in the Atlantic Ocean, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). We wouldn't expect to find a strong influence, given that the Atlantic is much farther away and downwind relative to the upper-level mean flow. But it's an interesting question nonetheless.
The charts below are parallel to those shown in the previous post. Most of the month-to-month variability in the distribution of temperature seems to be random, but there is an exception in July and August, when the negative AMO phase shows a modest association with unusually warm conditions. When the AMO is in the bottom quartile, July and August are warmer than normal about 75% of the time. Presumably they are also drier than normal, but I haven't looked at precipitation yet.
The charts below show similar behavior on a daily timescale for the negative AMO phase in summer, especially in July, and there are a few other interesting but less statistically significant features. Note that the AMO phase is currently positive, having entered a long-term positive phase in 1995.
The charts below are parallel to those shown in the previous post. Most of the month-to-month variability in the distribution of temperature seems to be random, but there is an exception in July and August, when the negative AMO phase shows a modest association with unusually warm conditions. When the AMO is in the bottom quartile, July and August are warmer than normal about 75% of the time. Presumably they are also drier than normal, but I haven't looked at precipitation yet.
The charts below show similar behavior on a daily timescale for the negative AMO phase in summer, especially in July, and there are a few other interesting but less statistically significant features. Note that the AMO phase is currently positive, having entered a long-term positive phase in 1995.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















































