There is also an enhanced probability of a wet summer in the northwestern half; the CPC forecasters cite "anomalously open sea ice and warmer-than average ocean temperatures" as the likely cause.
The forecast for June temperatures is nearly the same as the summer forecast, except with a higher chance of warmth in the south; the continued strongly positive PDO phase is no doubt the main rationale for this forecast. Wet conditions appear relatively likely across southwestern Alaska, and this is based on a consensus of computer models.
Here's a recent sea surface temperature map, showing both the positive PDO pattern and also the demise of El Niño - note the thin band of below-normal temperatures now evident along the equator in the eastern Pacific Ocean.
Let's compare these forecasts to the latest CFSv2 model forecasts (which of course do contribute to the subjective CPC forecast). The model agrees with widespread warmth for June, but the probabilities are now lower than in recent months' forecasts across southern Alaska; the really high probabilities are now confined to the ocean areas.
There's virtually no signal for June precipitation anomalies across the state:
The summer (JJA) forecast looks quite similar to CPC's forecast, except that CPC has wisely (in my opinion) ignored the Arctic cold anomaly that appears to be related to the CFSv2 sea ice forecast.
There's a little more of a wet signal for the three-month period:
The other day I showed an analog forecast based on the late winter PDO phase, suggesting that summer might not be all that warm across interior and southern Alaska. Reader Eric asked if the phase of ENSO was related to the patterns that emerged in the analog years, and it appears the answer is yes. The map below shows the 5 (out of 10) years that had the strongest El Niño conditions in February through April (although El Niño was only truly strong in 3 of the years); there is only a weak cool signal over central Alaska.
Contrast this result with the map below for the 5 years with the weakest El Niño conditions in February through April; 3 of these years had a near-neutral ENSO phase (the other 2 were weak El Niño's). In this case the summer cold signal is much stronger; so it appears that the cool summer scenario is more likely when a strongly positive PDO occurs in late winter without a strong El Niño; and that is certainly not what has happened this year.
Contrast this result with the map below for the 5 years with the weakest El Niño conditions in February through April; 3 of these years had a near-neutral ENSO phase (the other 2 were weak El Niño's). In this case the summer cold signal is much stronger; so it appears that the cool summer scenario is more likely when a strongly positive PDO occurs in late winter without a strong El Niño; and that is certainly not what has happened this year.
This has got me curious with what would have happened this summer if this last winter had a weak PDO. Previous blog posts have shown that, in general, a negative ENSO brings cold largely independent of the PDO while a positive ENSO is warm with the PDO greatly modulating the signal. If we had a weak PDO would the cool summer form? Will the coming La Nina overwhelm the forecast and make the summer/fall still colder? I really feel that seasonal analog forecasting is become more likely.
ReplyDeleteNice to have analysts and sensors to monitor the climate through this year and next. More puzzle pieces to put in place perhaps.
ReplyDeleteGary