Deep Cold: Alaska Weather & Climate
Objective Comments and Analysis - All Science, No Politics
Primary Author Richard James
2010-2013 Author Rick Thoman
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
Like Clockwork
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Minimal Fire So Far
Interior Alaska finally saw some genuinely warm weather last weekend, with temperatures pushing up toward the 80°F mark in many areas; and Fairbanks saw its first 80°F of the season - a few days later than normal.
The mini-heatwave didn't last long, but renewed warmth is on the way in the coming days, and the predicted mid-atmosphere pressure pattern looks conducive to the onset of more widespread lightning in the near future. The map below shows the expected 500mb height anomaly (departure from normal) for the next 7 days, indicating a broad axis of above-normal heights (i.e. a ridge) from eastern Russia to northwestern Canada:
Contrast the pattern in the first two weeks of this month, when a strong trough over the Arctic Ocean brought cool northwesterly air flows to interior and northern Alaska:
Atmospheric moisture has been well below normal for the time of year, and that means a lack of atmospheric fuel for thunderstorms.
No surprise, then, that statewide lightning activity is below normal and is now moving into "significantly below normal" territory; the climatological median ramps up quickly from June 15 on. Click to enlarge:
Thanks to the lack of lightning, year-to-date fire activity is close to zero: only 5600 acres have burned statewide so far, compared to a historical median of 85,000 acres for this date. In view of the weather forecast, this seems likely to change soon.
It's also worth noting that the past two weeks have been quite dry for most of the interior, a marked change from the wet spring; fire fuels have no doubt dried out quite a bit.
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
June Chill, May Climate
Friday, June 5, 2026
Surprise Frosts in Fairbanks
A few days ago, reader Carl commented that the National Weather Service forecasts for overnight low temperatures in Fairbanks seem to have been biased high recently, with many occasions of low temperatures near or below freezing when much higher temperatures were predicted.
To look at this objectively, I was able to pull a history of NWS forecasts all the way back to 2009, and it turns out that the mean absolute error on the low temperature forecasts in the month of May was the highest in the data set.
The errors, as Carl observed, were largely due to a warm bias; the low temperature forecasts were generally warmer than the corresponding outcome.
(A small caveat is in order here: I'm comparing the NWS forecasts for "Fairbanks Metro Area" to the outcome at the airport, and there are microclimate differences that vary depending on the weather pattern.)
Here's a look at the daily errors so far in 2026: the warm bias for minimum temperatures has been quite persistent.
For extra credit, I also did a comparison of the recent NWS forecasts with pure model forecasts (NBM - National Blend of Models) for Fairbanks airport - see below, with the black line in the lower panel revealing the frost and freeze events that Carl mentioned. As we might expect, the NWS forecasts closely follow the model predictions, so we can basically blame the recent warm bias on the models. Ideally the forecasters might have adjusted the model numbers to improve the results, and actually it looks like they did start making a downward adjustment to the low temperatures starting on May 25.
None of this should be seen as criticism of the NWS folks in the Fairbanks office, who cover the weather over a staggering 359,000 square miles, over 4 times more area than any NWS office in the lower 48.
Monday, June 1, 2026
30 Years on Keystone Ridge
Saturday, May 30, 2026
Cool Trends Persist
Cooler than normal temperatures have persisted recently in both southern and northern Alaska, and a quick glance at UAF's statewide temperature index confirms the decidedly chilly nature of this month for the state overall. Indeed, the month-to-date average of the UAF index suggests this is the coolest May since 2012, and it might be the coolest since 2001 when the final numbers come in.
It's rather notable that Utqiaġvik hasn't yet reached 32°F this year, and if it happens today or tomorrow it will be the latest since 2001 or 2000. If Utqiaġvik manages to get into June without a 32°F reading, it will be the latest since 1955.
Here's a map view of the temperature anomaly in the past 30 days, as estimated by ERA5 and ECMWF model data:
Note that the anomaly is expressed in terms of standard deviations, which gives a good sense of how unusual the situation has been: for example, 1.5-2 standard deviations cooler than normal in the vicinity of Cook Inlet. The standard deviation is calculated for the same 30-day window as the anomaly calculation.
Here's the 500mb height anomaly from the same perspective:
Here's the link to view these graphics for yourself: it's a page that I put together recently.
https://s2s.worldclimateservice.com/wcs/era5_monitoring/
Clicking on the 2m temperature map near Utqiaġvik produces a similar chart to the first one above (confirming the veracity of the model data), but the chart also appends the latest (00UTC initialized) ECMWF ensemble forecast. Cooler than normal conditions appear likely to persist on the North Slope in the next week or two.
Interestingly, the forecast suggests the 30-day temperature anomaly is likely to become rather strongly statistically significant to the north of Alaska in the coming days:
A caveat is in order, however: part of this anomaly could reflect a discrepancy between ECMWF's current forecast model and the much older model version that is used for the ERA5 reanalysis (historical baseline). Many tweaks and upgrades have been made by ECMWF since the ERA5 version was implemented, and the new model may have cooler 2m temperatures over Arctic sea ice at this time of year. We'll find out in a few weeks when the ERA5 data includes these dates and we can do the apples-to-apples historical comparison.
Nevertheless, the forecast does show a robust trough over the Arctic waters to the north and northeast of Alaska, so persistently below-normal temperatures are certainly plausible.












































