In the recent event, despite southerly flow in the middle troposphere, widespread deep ascent was generated by intense synoptic-scale forcing across the eastern interior. The series of maps at the end of this post shows the evolution of the flow pattern at several levels and documents how the storm system evolved.
Looking at historical data from Fairbanks, it's clear that heavy snow events are much more commonly associated with upper-level winds from directions between southwest and northwest. The chart below shows the wind vectors at 3pm AKST for each day since 1957 on which at least 6 inches of snow was observed. Note that the markers show the direction the wind is coming from, so the wind vector points from the marker to the chart's origin. Tuesday's event is represented by the only marker on the vertical axis (500mb wind from due south). Not only are winds more typically westerly during heavy snow events, wind speeds tend to be higher than they were on Tuesday, often 50 knots or higher at 500mb.
The next two charts show corresponding results for 700mb and 850mb winds. There's a nice clustering of wind vectors from a direction just south of west, with quite substantial velocity. On Tuesday afternoon the 700mb wind was almost calm (3 knots from 130°) and the 850mb wind was a light 7 knots from the northwest.
The 500mb chart above showed two historical snow events with an easterly component to the flow; the reanalysis 500mb maps for these events are shown below, along with the recent event (third map). The October 1963 and November 1996 events look rather similar to the most recent one, with a strong trough over western Alaska.
Below are the Fairbanks wind scatterplots for less substantial snow events with 3-5" in a calendar day. The main difference seems to be that wind speeds aloft are usually less when snow amounts are smaller.
To document the recent event in more detail, here is a series of maps showing the pressure and wind patterns at several levels. First, the MSLP evolution (times in AKST):
3pm Monday |
|
9pm Monday |
|
3am Tuesday |
|
9am Tuesday |
|
3pm Tuesday |
|
9pm Tuesday |
|
3am Wednesday |
|
3am Tuesday |
|
3pm Tuesday |
|
3am Wednesday |
|
3am Tuesday |
|
3pm Tuesday |
|
3am Wednesday |
|
3am Tuesday |
|
3pm Tuesday |
|
3am Wednesday |
|
It is very helpful to plan for further especially outdoor activities, when weather is observed first. Mobile application development
ReplyDeleteThe winter climate in Fairbanks – indeed in the whole “chinook belt” from Interior Alaska to West Texas – is a nightmare to live in but a statisticians’ delight.
ReplyDeleteThe region, during the winter months, sees the greatest range of recorded monthly temperatures in the world. Fort Vermilion, Alberta, has ranged in December from -57.8˚C or -72˚F to 18.3˚C or 64.9˚F and further south Havre, Montana has ranged in February from -55˚F or -48.3˚C to 74˚F or 23.3˚C.
What’s notable, though, is that the majority of the limited winter precipitation in Interior Alaska seems to come from a third type of weather distinct form the cold “continental” and mild chinook regimes. This “westerly” regime has a strong block over the North Pacific, rather than over inland Canada, so that relatively mild and moist air can come int via the Bering Sea (which is of course frozen but still does somewhat moderate winters in Nome vis-à-vis Siberia or the Interior). This is what happened in the amazingly snowy January 1937: at ‘http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/077/mwr-077-04-0099.pdf’ one sees a huge westerly anomaly in mean flow along with a strong northerly anomaly over the West – one day that month it was as cold in sweltering Yuma as in Fairbanks!
Thanks for the comment. I know some who would disagree with your "nightmare" assessment, but the historical data certainly are entertaining.
DeleteI agree with your analysis of the importance of the winter westerly regime.