Saturday, April 18, 2015

Growing Degree Days

As a follow-up to the previous post, I calculated the accumulated growing degree days (base 50 °F) during the growing season for a few locations in interior Alaska.  The growing season could be defined in various ways, but I used the period between the last and first 30°F freeze.  First, the results for Fairbanks:


It's interesting to see that although Fairbanks has seen a couple of extremely warm summers in recent years (2004, 2013), the 15-year median hasn't changed much in the past 40 years.  One trend I would note, however, is the recent lack of very cool summers.

If we compare the latest 15-year median value to the lowest median value from the early years, we arrive at a long-term increase in growing degree days of 33%.  As expected, this is greater than the ~20% increase in length of the growing season; so the growing season has become both longer and warmer, which results in a large combined impact for vegetation.

We get a slightly different sense of the long-term trend if we use a 20-year trailing mean on the data - see below.  The latest 20-year mean is 1047 GDDs, and the earliest (1930-1949) value was 742 GDDs, so this gives us an increase of 41%.


Here are the charts for three other locations with generally reliable long-term data.  Note that I excluded any year with 5 or more days of missing data during the growing season, and for less than 5 missing days I replaced the missing data with the 1981-2010 normals (to avoid bias in the accumulations).




The relatively benign summer climate of Fairbanks (airport) is evident here, as the other interior locations all have far fewer GDDs on average.  Given Northway's southerly location, it's interesting to see just how little warmth is available during the growing season; this is the effect of 1700' of elevation.  Just for the sake of comparison, Chicago's 1981-2010 average for growing season GDDs is 2909.  However, lower-48 locations don't have the length of day that allows for accelerated plant growth during Alaska's short growing season.

Growing degree days are customarily calculated from the daily minimum and maximum temperature (rather than the true daily mean of temperatures), and this allows us to look at long-term trends in the contribution of minimum versus maximum temperatures.  For example, the chart below shows the annual contribution of minimum and maximum temperatures to the growing season GDDs in Fairbanks; the overall GDD value is the average of the two lines.  We see that GDDs have risen because of increases in both minimum and maximum temperatures; the long-term linear trends are about the same.


Below are the corresponding charts for the other locations.  I expected to see that minimum temperature increases would contribute at least as much to the long-term increase in GDDs at these locations too, but this is not true at all: in fact there is very little overall change in the minimum temperature contributions (and Northway has cooled in the past decade or so).  This means that the long-term rise in GDDs has been caused entirely by rising daily maximum temperatures on those days that contribute to the GDD total (i.e. daily mean temperature above 50 °F).  According to these results, it would seem that the mean diurnal range has increased in summer, which is a surprising result as diurnal range is normally observed to decrease in a long-term warming trend (see e.g. article here).

Further investigation will be required to see if the trends seen here are reflective of broader trends across Alaska and to examine the seasonal extent of the apparent increase in average diurnal range.




2 comments:

  1. Well, there are my pesky friends the clouds again referenced in the article linked above.

    I'm compelled to ask: How has could cover varied during summer for the reporting stations above?

    I hope we don't have another major volcanic event anytime soon to darken the sky and reduce insolation.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gary, good question and one I shall endeavor to address when I take a closer look at the summer trends. The increasing diurnal range certainly suggests decreasing cloudiness over time.

    ReplyDelete